More risk with LAG at 36 slots?

Discussion in 'Community Workshop' started by NL-Jos, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:07 PM.

  1. NL-Jos

    NL-Jos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Ratings:
    +118 / 0
    Best @J-F Chardon or @Georg Ortner or someone else from @Sector3
    When i run a dedicated server with 36 slots i get the message: Having too many players can result in latency issues
    Will this say the change of getting LAG is higher when i have 36 slots instead of 35 slots?
    If this is so, why not a maximum of 35 slots then?
     
  2. J-F Chardon

    J-F Chardon Sector3 Producer Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +2,571 / 0
    This is a warning we have added and set at 36 because it appeared after testing that 35 was around what most common server specs would handle nicely.

    If you have a solid server, feel free to experiment higher amounts. Take a look at the network / CPU useage of your server under regular use and see if it could handle more.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1